14 April 2009

[NY] Governor to Submit Bill Legalizing Gay Marriage

suggested by Eric, re-posted from New York Times

Paterson to Submit Bill Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage in New York
by Jeremy W. Peters, 04/15/09

Gov. David A. Paterson plans to introduce legislation on Thursday to make marriage between same-sex couples legal in New York, advancing his push for greater rights for gay men and lesbians, at a time when other states have done so.

Mr. Paterson’s plans represent the most public effort yet by the governor, who has been a consistent supporter of gay rights, to position himself and New York at the crest of a broadening national movement.

The move allows him to lead on an issue that could prove defining in his governorship, which has so far been marked by political missteps and the crumbling economy.

But it is also something of a political gamble, because the legislation faces an uphill climb in the State Senate. Democrats acknowledge that they do not have enough votes there to get the measure approved, meaning that its chances could rest in the hands of a few Republicans.

The governor also risks alienating socially conservative voters at a time when he can least afford to drive away any more support.

Nevertheless, he has said he is committed to putting the measure to a vote in Albany sooner rather than later.

“The timing was always right,” Mr. Paterson said on Tuesday as he announced an economic-development grant in Nassau County. “It’s just who is willing to take that step. And I am.”

Once Mr. Paterson introduces the bill, a step that he is expected to formally announce on Thursday morning, the focus will shift to the Assembly, where the measure passed in 2007 by a vote of 85 to 61, and is expected to pass again this year.

“And I think that all could happen rather quickly,” said Micah Z. Kellner, a Democratic assemblyman who represents the Upper East Side. Once the Assembly acts, it will be up to Senate Democrats, who control the chamber 32 to 30, to decide whether to bring it to the floor for a vote. Some in the Senate, including its only openly gay member, Thomas K. Duane, have said they want the bill to be voted on only if its passage is certain.

Some same-sex-marriage supporters said they hoped that by introducing the measure now, when it is likely to receive plenty of attention after the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision this month overturning a ban on same-sex marriage and the Vermont Legislature’s vote last week to override a veto of a bill allowing gay couples to marry, the governor would create momentum for the bill.

“Maybe by coming out publicly like this and reaffirming his support for marriage equality, the governor can sway some colleagues in the other house who might be nervous about voting for this,” said Matthew Titone, a Democratic assemblyman from Staten Island. “I think it’s an opportunity for him to show people that he really believes in something.”

But cracking the Senate Republican conference, which is known for its unanimity and solidarity, will be a difficult task, same-sex-marriage supporters concede. Republican leaders have said they are not budging on the issue.

“Our conference hasn’t supported gay marriage, and nothing has changed,” said John McArdle, a spokesman for Senate Republicans.

But Mr. Duane said that he had assurances from some Republicans that they would vote for the bill. He declined to name them.

Still, Mr. Duane said that while the governor’s bill was an important gesture, it could end up being ultimately just that.

“It’s still only paper, words, unless we all fight to make it a reality,” he said.


12 April 2009

[U.S.] Only 53% of Americans think Capitalism is Bette Than Socialism

re-posted from rasmussenreports.com

Sure, it's not 0% believing in capitalism (yet) but, as far as survey research goes, 53% is pretty exciting. --ianna.

Just 53% Say Capitalism Better Than Socialism, 04/09/09

Only 53% of American adults believe capitalism is better than socialism.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 20% disagree and say socialism is better. Twenty-seven percent (27%) are not sure which is better.

Adults under 30 are essentially evenly divided: 37% prefer capitalism, 33% socialism, and 30% are undecided. Thirty-somethings are a bit more supportive of the free-enterprise approach with 49% for capitalism and 26% for socialism. Adults over 40 strongly favor capitalism, and just 13% of those older Americans believe socialism is better.

Investors by a 5-to-1 margin choose capitalism. As for those who do not invest, 40% say capitalism is better while 25% prefer socialism.

There is a partisan gap as well. Republicans - by an 11-to-1 margin - favor capitalism. Democrats are much more closely divided: Just 39% say capitalism is better while 30% prefer socialism. As for those not affiliated with either major political party, 48% say capitalism is best, and 21% opt for socialism.

The question posed by Rasmussen Reports did not define either capitalism or socialism

It is interesting to compare the new results to an earlier survey in which 70% of Americans prefer a free-market economy. The fact that a “free-market economy” attracts substantially more support than “capitalism” may suggest some skepticism about whether capitalism in the United States today relies on free markets.

Other survey data supports that notion. Rather than seeing large corporations as committed to free markets, two-out-of-three Americans believe that big government and big business often work together in ways that hurt consumers and investors.

Fifteen percent (15%) of Americans say they prefer a government-managed economy, similar to the 20% support for socialism. Just 14% believe the federal government would do a better job running auto companies, and even fewer believe government would do a better job running financial firms.

Most Americans today hold views that can generally be defined as populist while only seven percent (7%) share the elitist views of the Political Class.


[West Virginia] The Art of Being a Neighbor

re-posted from NPR: Weekend Edition/This I Believe

The Art of Being a Neighbor
By Eve Birch, 04/12/09

I used to believe in the American dream that meant a job, a mortgage, cable, credit, warranties, success. I wanted it and worked toward it like everyone else, all of us separately chasing the same thing.

One year, through a series of unhappy events, it all fell apart. I found myself homeless and alone. I had my truck and $56.

I scoured the countryside for someplace I could rent for the cheapest possible amount. I came upon a shack in an isolated hollow, four miles up a winding mountain road over the Potomac River in West Virginia.

It was abandoned, full of broken glass and rubbish. When I pried off the plywood over a window and climbed in, I found something I could put my hands to. I hadn't been alone for 25 years. I was scared, but I hoped the hard work would distract and heal me.

I found the owner and rented the place for $50 a month. I took a bedroll, a broom, rope, a gun and cooking gear, and cleared a corner to camp in while I worked.

The locals knew nothing about me. But slowly, they started teaching me the art of being a neighbor. They dropped off blankets, candles, tools and canned deer meat, and they began sticking around to chat. They'd ask if I wanted to meet cousin Albie or go fishing, maybe get drunk some night. They started to teach me a belief in a different American dream — not the one of individual achievement but one of neighborliness.

Men would stop by with wild berries, ice cream, truck parts and bullets to see if I was up for courting. I wasn't, but they were civil anyway. The women on that mountain worked harder than any I'd ever met. They taught me the value of a whetstone to sharpen my knives, how to store food in the creek and keep it cold and safe. I learned to keep enough for an extra plate for company.

What I had believed in, all those things I thought were the necessary accouterments for a civilized life, were nonexistent in this place. Up on the mountain, my most valuable possessions were my relationships with my neighbors.

After four years in that hollow, I moved back into town. I saw that a lot of people were having a really hard time, losing their jobs and homes. With the help of a real estate broker I chatted up at the grocery store, I managed to rent a big enough house to take in a handful of people.

It's four of us now, but over time I've had nine come in and move on to other places from here. We'd all be in shelters if we hadn't banded together.

The American dream I believe in now is a shared one. It's not so much about what I can get for myself; it's about how we can all get by together.


11 April 2009

[Canada] Several Cities Contemplating Drive-thru Ban

re-posted from ActionSpark.com

Numerous Cities Contemplating Drive-thru Ban
By cstar, 03/02/09

Various Canadian cities – including North Vancouver, BC, Edmonton, AB, King's County, NS, and Toronto, Peterborough, London, Ajax, Mississauga, and Sarnia, ON – are currently looking at banning, more strictly regulating, or studying the impacts of drive-thru restaurants.

As reported by CTV.ca on January 22, "A North Vancouver councillor wants to ban restaurants from building drive-thrus in his city because he's worried about the environmental damages caused by idling vehicles. Councillor Sam Schechter introduced a motion Monday night to ban drive-thrus at restaurants. The motion would also prevent the only current restaurant in the City of North Vancouver with a drive-thru, an A&W, from expanding...In the U.S., two cities in California and one in North Carolina have imposed moratoriums on drive-thrus as a result of similar initiatives. City council has ordered an investigation into Schechter's motion and has asked for a report in a few months."

The Kitchener-Record also reported on January 22 that, "Kitchener could soon join a growing list of cities looking to ban, or regulate more closely, new drive-thru operations. City council is expected to consider the issue in early March, following the lead of cities that include London, Hamilton, Mississauga and Winnipeg.

In 2006, an air-quality report from the (Kitchener Environmental Advisory) committee called for a ban on drive-thrus and for an anti-idling campaign...The report was accepted by city councillors, who launched an anti-idling campaign last year...but city councillors took no action on drive-thrus."

On January 25, the Edmonton Sun reported that, "Some green-minded civic politicians want Edmonton to consider closing the window on new restaurant drive-thrus and their idling vehicles. The belief is that would send fewer greenhouse gases into the atmosphere...(Councillor Don) Iveson said a ban on new drive-thrus could be considered in the Alberta capital as the city in the coming months reviews the way neighbourhoods are designed. He wants to see more pedestrian-friendly planning...Councillor Dave Thiele said a ban on drive-thrus may ultimately be what the city needs. He said he's stopped using the lanes altogether in an effort to reduce his carbon footprint and because he finds the service inside to be quicker."

And the Erie Times-News reported on February 10, "Toronto and Vancouver have instituted bans on building new drive-thru coffee shops and created strict regulations on building drive-thrus in residential, mixed commercial-residential areas and some pedestrian areas. Other cities, including Hamilton and North Vancouver, are considering similar regulations. Officials who are proponents of the bans say that bans of drive-thrus would improve air quality by reducing the number of idling cars."

Toronto's CityTV reported on December 17, 2007 that, "Two years ago, a Toronto bylaw came into effect prohibiting new drive-thrus within 100 feet of any residential property. But some councillors think it's time to toughen up that law. 'Many, many American municipalities have gone in the direction of just absolutely banning drive-thrus, and it's time for the city of Toronto to consider the same,' maintains Councillor Joe Mihevc."

Business opposition

In terms of opposition to the proposed bans on drive-thrus, the Kitchener-Record reported that, "City councillors recently deferred any decision about a ban on new drive-thrus because they want to hear details of a study by Mike Lepage of RWDI, a Guelph-based consulting firm. The study concludes that cars idling in a drive-thru are less harmful than having the engines shut off for a few minutes and then restarted. The study cited the burst of particulates that is released when a cooling engine restarts. The study was paid for by Tim Hortons and is being peer-reviewed by scientists at Carleton University in Ottawa, said Victor Labreche, a private-sector planner representing Tim Hortons, who appeared before councillors recently.

The peer review won't be ready until late February or early March. City councillors want to see the review before making any decision about a ban." The North Shore News reported on January 23 that, "The drive-through option offers safety and convenience to many people, such as parents with small children, the physically challenged and the elderly, and a ban would produce questionable environmental benefits, he said. Parking lot only locations produce about 60 per cent more green house gases and 20 per cent more smog pollutants than drive-through services, Mark von Schellwitz (spokesman for the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association) said."

Yet, as reported by the Canadian Press on December 8, 2007, "Students at the University of Alberta monitored a popular Tim Hortons outlet in Edmonton last year for 54 hours and counted 3,756 vehicles idling for an average of more than five minutes each. The longest idle was more than 12 minutes." Additionally, the Edmonton Sun reported that, "A 2006 University of Alberta study found that vehicles idling in fast-food drive-thrus across Edmonton contribute about 8,600 tonnes of emissions per year into the atmosphere." A study conducted by the Ontario Medical Association in 2005 estimated that there are 5,829 premature deaths and 16,807 hospital admissions due to air pollution each year.

The London chapter

The London chapter of the Council of Canadians has launched a petition which states, "Drive-throughs are an incredible detriment to our environment and are a luxury item we can live without. Climate Change is real. A grave threat to all life on this planet. It is time to place our environment and the health and well being of our children ahead of business interests and profits. I demand that all levels of government impose an immediate moratorium on all new commercial drive-through operations and establish a timetable to phase out all existing drive-through operations through zoning or other by-laws." To sign the petition go to, http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ban-drive--throughs-in-canada.

The Council of Canadians has argued that the five principles of a Canadian Energy Strategy should include security of supply, production, distribution, access, and the environment. Within security of the environment we argue that, "Canadians are concerned about climate change. In spite of this, we are also a wasteful nation in terms of water and energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions. We need to push the government to enact policies that meet the expectations of Canadians by encouraging environmentally sustainable production, distribution and use of energy."

And as municipal politicians consider the idea of addressing drive-thru restaurants, federal politicians may want to look again at the issue of federal cabinet ministers and their idling limousines on Parliament Hill. As reported by the CanWest News Service on February 5, 2007, "Federal cabinet ministers must insist their chauffeurs stop idling their limousines for hours at a time during long winter meetings on Parliament Hill, according to MPs who add that every measure counts when it comes to reducing greenhouse-gas emissions...(MP Yves) Godin wants the House affairs committee to resurrect a 1990 edict ordering ministers' chauffeurs to stop idling their engines. RCMP officers were asked to enforce the rule, said Godin."


[Thailand] Thai Protests Disrupt Asia Summit

re-posted from BBC News

Thai Protests Disrupt Asia Summit
04/11/09

Anti-government protesters in Thailand have smashed into the venue of a Asian summit in the resort of Pattaya.

A Thai government government spokesman said leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) decided to postpone the talks.

It is not clear so far whether only the Saturday session or the whole two-day summit has been cancelled.

Thailand has been in turmoil for months, following the removal of allies of former PM Thaksin Shinawatra.

Some 2,000 of the red-shirted protesters, who back Mr Thaksin, had arrived in the beach resort on Friday.

This week also saw huge protests by the anti-government camp in the capital, Bangkok.

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva had vowed the Asean summit, called to discuss the global financial crisis, would go ahead.

It was due to get into full swing on Saturday before concluding on Sunday with a summit due to include India, Australia and New Zealand.

The new government has been left embarrassed by the ease with which its opponents have been able to disrupt such a high-level gathering, the BBC's Jonathan Head reports.

Riot police reportedly intervened to separate the protesters from hundreds of blue-shirted government supporters.

Some government supporters were armed with sticks and bottles and some of the protesters could be seen wielding sticks and at least one knife.

Deputy Thai government spokesman Supachai Jaisamut said the government was investigating unconfirmed reports that three people were shot and wounded in the clashes.

"There is an informal report of two or three injured, they are blue shirts," he said.

"We don't know exactly but maybe the bullets came from the red shirts?"

Witnesses say the protesters used taxis and at least two large lorries to block the talks venue.

"The Asean-China summit has been postponed because of the attempts to block the arrangement of the leaders," Thai government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn told reporters.

Earlier, Japanese Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone was unable to enter the talks venue because protesters were blocking the entrance.

An unnamed Japanese foreign ministry official told Reuters news agency that while the trilateral meeting had been cancelled, the Japanese foreign minister did speak by telephone separately with his South Korean and Chinese counterparts.

A Chinese official told AFP news agency that the ministers had waited for an hour before deciding to cancel.

The meeting would have been the foreign ministers' first opportunity to discuss last Sunday's launch of a North Korean rocket, widely viewed as a long-range missile test.

Resignation demand

The Asean summit has already been postponed and relocated several times because of Thailand's political turmoil.

Mr Abhisit came to power in December. He formed a coalition after a court ruled the previous government, led by allies of Mr Thaksin, was illegal.

The move came after anti-Thaksin protesters shut down the country's airport for eight days and besieged government offices.

Mr Thaksin's supporters in the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) accuse Mr Abhisit's government of being a puppet of the military.

They say he took office illegitimately and should resign so fresh elections can be held.


[Mecca] Sheik Adil Kalbani: First Black Man to Lead Prayers in Mecca

I just want to note that the tone of this article does rely a bit on exoticizing time; the author goes out of their way to juxtapose religious practice against technologies (YouTube, cellphones, etc) in a way that seems to suggest that Islam and technology exist separately, in different times. So, yes, the writing of this article is a little fucked up, but the story is still good news. Happy reading --ianna.

re-posted from New York Times


The Saturday Profile - A Black Imam Breaks Ground in Mecca
By Robert F. Worth, 04/10/09

Two years ago, Sheik Adil Kalbani dreamed that he had become an imam at the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Islam’s holiest city.

Waking up, he dismissed the dream as a temptation to vanity. Although he is known for his fine voice, Sheik Adil is black, and the son of a poor immigrant from the Persian Gulf. Leading prayers at the Grand Mosque is an extraordinary honor, usually reserved for pure-blooded Arabs from the Saudi heartland.

So he was taken aback when the phone rang last September and a voice told him that King Abdullah had chosen him as the first black man to lead prayers in Mecca. Days later Sheik Adil’s unmistakably African features and his deep baritone voice, echoing musically through the Grand Mosque, were broadcast by satellite TV to hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world.

Since then, Sheik Adil has been half-jokingly dubbed the “Saudi Obama.” Prominent imams are celebrities in this deeply religious country, and many have hailed his selection as more evidence of King Abdullah’s cautious efforts to move Saudi Arabia toward greater openness and tolerance in the past few years.

“The king is trying to tell everybody that he wants to rule this land as one nation, with no racism and no segregation,” said Sheik Adil, a heavyset and long-bearded man of 49 who has been an imam at a Riyadh mosque for 20 years. “Any qualified individual, no matter what his color, no matter where from, will have a chance to be a leader, for his good and his country’s good.”

Officially, it was his skill at reciting the Koran that won him the position, which he carries out — like the Grand Mosque’s eight other prayer leaders — only during the holy month of Ramadan. But the racial significance of the king’s gesture was unmistakable.

Sheik Adil, like most Saudis, is quick to caution that any racism here is not the fault of Islam, which preaches egalitarianism. The Prophet Muhammad himself, who founded the religion here 1,400 years ago, had black companions.

“Our Islamic history has so many famous black people,” said the imam, as he sat leaning his arm on a cushion in the reception room of his home. “It is not like the West.”

It is also true that Saudi Arabia is far more ethnically diverse than most Westerners realize. Saudis with Malaysian or African features are a common sight along the kingdom’s west coast, the descendants of pilgrims who came here over the centuries and ended up staying. Many have prospered and even attained high positions through links to the royal family. Bandar bin Sultan, the former Saudi ambassador to the United States, is the son of Prince Sultan and a dark-skinned concubine from southern Saudi Arabia.

But slavery was practiced here too, and was abolished only in 1962. Many traditional Arabs from Nejd, the central Saudi heartland, used to refer to all outsiders as “tarsh al bahr” — vomit from the sea. People of African descent still face some discrimination, as do most immigrants, even from other Arab countries. Many Saudis complain that the kingdom is still far too dominated by Nejd, the homeland of the royal family. There are nonracial forms of discrimination too, and many Shiite Muslims, a substantial minority, say they are not treated fairly.

“The prophet told us that social classes will remain, because of human nature,” Sheik Adil said gravely. “These are part of the pre-Islamic practices that persist.”

Black skin is not the only social obstacle Sheik Adil has overcome. His father came to Saudi Arabia in the 1950s from Ras al Khaima, in what is now the United Arab Emirates, and obtained a job as a low-level government clerk. The family had little money, and after finishing high school, Adil took a job with Saudi Arabian Airlines while attending night classes at King Saud University.

Only later did he study religion, laboriously memorizing the Koran and studying Islamic jurisprudence. In 1984 he passed the government exam to become an imam, and worked briefly at the mosque in the Riyadh airport. Four years later he won a more prominent position as the imam of the King Khalid mosque, a tall white building that is not far from one of the Intelligence Ministry’s offices.

Theologically, Sheik Adil reflects the general evolution of Saudi thinking over the last two decades. During the 1980s he met Osama bin Laden and Abdullah Azzam, a leader of the jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan. He initially sympathized with their radical position and anger toward the West. Later, he said, he began to find their views narrow, especially after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Now he speaks warmly of King Abdullah’s new initiatives, which include efforts to moderate the power of the hard-line religious establishment and to modernize Saudi Arabia’s judiciary and educational establishment. He reads Al Watan, a liberal newspaper.

“Some people in this country want everyone to be a carbon copy,” Sheik Adil said. “This is not my way of thinking. You can learn from the person who is willing to criticize, to give a different point of view.”

His life, like that of most imams, follows a rigid routine: he leads prayers five times a day at the mosque, then walks across the parking lot to his home, which he shares with two wives and 12 children. On Fridays, he gives a sermon as well.

He expected it to continue that way for the rest of his life. Then in early September he woke up to hear his cellphone and land line, both ringing continuously. Stirring from bed, he heard the administrator of the Grand Mosque leaving a message. He picked up one of the phones, and heard the news that the king had selected him.

Two days later he walked into a grand reception room where he was greeted by Prince Khalid al-Faisal, the governor of Mecca Province. Sheik Adil tried to introduce himself, but the prince cut him off with a smile: “You are known,” he said.

Next, Sheik Adil was led to a table where he sat with King Abdullah and other ministers. He was too shy to address the king directly, but as he left the room he thanked him and kissed him on the nose, a traditional sign of deference.

Remembering the moment, Sheik Adil smiled and went silent. Then he pulled out his laptop and showed a visitor a YouTube clip of him reciting the Koran at the Grand Mosque in Mecca.

“To recite before thousands of people, this is no problem for me,” he said. “But the place, its holiness, is so different from praying anywhere else. In that shrine, there are kings, presidents and ordinary people, all being led in prayer by you as imam. It gives you a feeling of honor, and a fear of almighty God.”

10 April 2009

[Utah] Four Day Workweek

re-posted from NPR, Morning Edition

Utah Finds Surprising Benefits In 4-Day Workweek
By Jenny Brudin, 04/10/09

Last summer, amid surging gas prices, Utah became the first state in the nation to mandate a four-day workweek for state employees.

A recent assessment of the program by state planners found the expected energy cost savings haven't materialized, but there have been unexpected boosts to productivity and worker satisfaction.

Sonia Smith is one of the 18,000 state workers who began a four-day, 10-hour workweek eight months ago. At first, she says, she was shocked and scared about the change. The state accountant is a single mom, and she worried about child care for her 10-year-old son. Now, Smith is a champion of the switch.

"I like having the three-day weekend," Smith says. "I like being able to have one day set aside to do everything that I need to do, and then the other two days where I can devote to my son."

Every Friday morning now, Smith volunteers at her son's school. She helps students with their spelling tests and relishes the extra time with her son. Smith's family and baby sitter adjusted their schedules to enable her to work the adjusted hours.

Smith is among the 70 percent of Utah state employees surveyed who now say they prefer the shorter workweek. Mike Hansen, strategic planning manager in the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, says one of the more surprising effects of this workday change is that employees are now taking significantly less leave.

"That's increased productivity — that's employees behind their desk more this year than the last two years, to the tune of 9 percent" less time off, Hansen says. Paid overtime is also down.

But when Utah implemented the shorter workweek, the goal was to cut energy use by 20 percent and save the state money — and those big savings haven't come through yet.

So far, energy use has been reduced — but only by 13 percent. Each of Utah's 900 government buildings is unique. State energy managers have to figure out how to turn everything off on Fridays — especially the massive heating and air conditioning units.

Energy specialists monitor kilowatt hours used at state buildings, looking for inefficiencies that might be driving costs up. In May, the state also plans to kick off a peer-to-peer energy reduction campaign in each department.

The shift to longer hours isn't without other challenges.

For Nicki Lockhart the change has taken a toll emotionally and physically. "I hate it," she says. "It is not working one single bit for me."

On a recent day, Lockhart walks around her office building. It's about 3:30 in the afternoon, right when fatigue is starting to set in, with nearly three more hours of work left to go. "A 10-hour day for me is like eternity," she says.

By the time the customer service agent gets home and eats dinner, she says, it's time for bed. By Friday, Lockhart is so stressed out, she gets headaches. She's one of the 20 percent of state employees who are still struggling with the change.

But the good news, for everybody, is that the reduction in Friday commuters and the energy savings in buildings have cut down the carbon dioxide pumped into the local air. And the public — the people these government offices serve — seems happy with the change.

Exiting the Department of Motor Vehicles office, Utah resident Jose Sales says he likes the 10-hour days the program created "because I can come in after work and take care of my business — 20 minutes and I'm done."

Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman will decide next summer whether to make the four-day week permanent. If Utah's experiment succeeds, it could have an impact on thousands of workers across the country.

"Nobody else has done it like this on this scale," says Hansen of the Office of Budget and Planning, "and everybody is watching."