Showing posts with label recession. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recession. Show all posts

09 December 2008

[Illinois] Governor Suspends Bizz With Bank Of America

re-posted from Huffington Post

by Katharine Zaleski

Illinois Governor Suspends Business With Bank Of America

Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich announced Monday that he is asking all Illinois government agencies to suspend business with Bank of America. Blagojevich contended that Bank Of America received a multi-billion dollar bailout from the government and should accordingly restore credit to the Republic Windows & Doors company in Chicago.

Officials from Bank of America, which canceled the company's financing, are scheduled to meet Monday afternoon with Republic officials and union leaders.

More about the protest:

About 200 workers who lost their jobs last week with little notice have been occupying the plant around-the-clock in eight-hour shifts, said Fried said. About 60 were inside early Monday.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez said Monday's meeting would address the workers' concerns.

Company officials have not commented since the sit-in began Friday, and have not responded to calls and e-mails. Gutierrez said company officials had signed a waiver permitting the opening of its financial records at the meeting.

Republic Windows and Doors told the workers on Dec. 2 that they would be out of work by the end of the week.

Fried said the company told the union that Bank of America had canceled its financing. The bank had said in a statement that it wasn't responsible for Republic's financial obligations to its employees.

07 December 2008

[Canada] Lessons and questions about homelessness organizing

re-posted from Save Feral Human Habitat blog

by Fiach Johnson, http://bullsheet.wordpress.com/2008/12/06/new-solutions-for-homelessness/

New Solutions for Homelessness

It’s not often that I talk about my own personal life here on this blog. Mostly I keep it focused on reposting media articles on homelessness related activism and eco-defence (among a few other things.) However, there is some cross-over here, in the sense that I’m also involved in the things I write about.

I live in the city Of Victoria, BC, on Lekwungen Territory. The latest homeless count put the number of homeless people here at around 1500. Some people argue that if you include everyone who is underhoused or living in unstable situations the number is closer to 10,000. After a certain point however, the exact number doesn’t matter. There are less than 200 shelter mats, and worse than that, there are few options for someone who has found themselves on the street.

You may have noticed that the content of this blog has been dominated lately by news of tent cities across North America. Here in Victoria, we’ve had the occasional short term tent city, all of them busted by the police. The latest attempts have happened in the wake of a BC Supreme Court decision ruling that homeless people have a right to erect temporary shelter to protect themselves from the elements. Tent city activists have interpreted the ruling to mean that people can have tents up whenever they need shelter, day or night. The city of Victoria interprets the ruling to mean that people have that right only at night. Recently the city asked the judge to clarify the ruling by adding the words ‘at night. The judge refused.

My analysis of public sentiment is that the public generally accepts the ruling, but does not want to see tent cities spring up in public parks.

In the past year or so of studying this idea, I’ve been convinced that it is something we need in this area, and I have joined the efforts to make services like this a reality here.

We’re in the process of forming a working group to create a plan for making this idea a reality.

Below I’ve posted the questions that we’ll be addressing during this planning process. One question that isn’t addressed in the following list, is what do we call this new tent city?

I ask that because Tent City has taken on a meaning in this and other cities that causes a wall to go up immediately for some people.

The new police chief and Mayor were both recently quoted as saying “Bad things happen in tent cities.” and have stated they would not be allowing tent cities to happen on their watch.

That leaves us with the task of creating something that fulfills the same purpose as a tent city, but is not necessarily the kind of uncontrollable autonomous zone that the mayor and police chief fear. What we’re setting out to create is a form of temporary emergency shelter that is cheaper and quicker to implement than a traditional homeless shelter, one that borrows from the idea of tent cities the kind of independence and 24/7 access that tent cities offer; a place where people can stay with their spouses and/or pets and where they are able to work at night and sleep at day, or have a place to call their own, even if it is a cheap tent. Obviously real homes with real walls and running water and heat are preferable, but while we wait for these homes to manifest (Victoria has a vacancy rate of around 1%, and new rental housing has not been built in decades.) we need somewhere that the people who are sleeping outside, and dying as a result, can have a higher level of comfort.

In addition to that, those of you who have been following tent city news have seen that the economic crisis is forcing many people out onto the street, and tent cities are springing up to serve formally middle-class people. Whose to say we won’t see a similar crisis in this city? Are we prepared to deal with an influx of homeless people? What can we do to prepare for a problem that is going to grow before it goes away?

Those of us working to create a tent city have one solution, and we hope to see it, and other innovate ideas implemented as soon as possible.

So here are the questions that I have put forward to those people attending this week’s planning meeting:

Rationale

*Why do we need this kind of service?
*In what ways are other services lacking that this project can address?

Who Will Use This Service?

*What restrictions, if any will we have?
*Would it make the project more acceptable to focus on certain groups, ie, disabled, elderly, families?

Municipal/Legal Regulations and Relations

*What are the regulations prohibiting this project
*What are the municipalities willing to do to relax these regulations/What do they require from us?

Community Relations

*What are the concerns of the public towards this project?
*What kinds of actions can we take to engage/dialogue with the public?

Land

*Where will this happen?
*Private or public land?
*One or more camps?

Camp Regulations

*What is allowed/not allowed in the camps?

Food

*What kind of food will we provide?
*How will we acquire it?

Safety/Security

*What kind of training would volunteers require?
*How will we keep people and their belongings safe?

Supports

*What kinds of supports will we need to offer?
*What do we have the capacity to provide?
*How do we build our capacity to provide more?

Funding/Supplies

*What will this cost us?
*What do we need?
*Where will we get the funding/supplies we need?

Volunteers

*What is our volunteer capacity to implement this project?
*What kind of commitment is required of those involved?
*What kinds of structures will we have for dividing tasks?

Similar/Previous Projects

*What can we learn from existing/past/attempted projects of this kind?

Administration

*How will this project be governed?
*Will we form a non-profit, or seek assistance from another non-profit?
*How will we make decisions that affect the project?

Timeline

*When do we hope to have this plan finished?
*When do we hope to start providing service?

[Chicago] Continued coverage of factory occupation

re-posted from Associated Press

Idled workers occupy factory in Chicago
, By Rupa Shenoy

December 6, 2008

CHICAGO - Outraged and determined Chicago factory workers who were abruptly laid off this week have occupied their former workplace and say they won't leave until they get the severance and vacation pay they say they're owed.

The employees say they received three days notice their plant was closing. In the second day of a sit-in on the factory floor Saturday, about 250 union workers occupied the building in shifts while union leaders outside criticized a Wall Street bailout they say is leaving laborers behind.

About 50 workers sat on pallets and chairs inside the Republic Windows and Doors plant, supplied with donated food, sleeping bags and blankets. Leah Fried, an organizer with the United Electrical Workers, said the Chicago-based vinyl window manufacturer failed to give its 300 employees the 60 days' notice required by law before shutting.

During the takeover, workers have been shoveling snow and cleaning the building, Fried said.

"We're doing something we haven't done since the 1930s, so we're trying to make it work," Fried said.

She said the company can't pay employees because its creditor, Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America, won't let them. Crain's Chicago Business reported that Republic Windows' monthly sales had fallen to $2.9 million from $4 million during the past month. In a memo to the union, obtained by the business journal, Republic CEO Rich Gillman said the company had "no choice but to shut our doors."

Bank of America received $25 billion from the government's financial bailout package. The company said in a statement to news outlets Saturday that it isn't responsible for Republic's financial obligations to its employees.

Representatives of Republic Windows did not immediately respond Saturday to calls and e-mails seeking comment.

"Across cultures, religions, union and nonunion, we all say this bailout was a shame," said Richard Berg, president of Teamsters Local 743. "If this bailout should go to anything, it should go to the workers of this country."

Outside the plant, protesters wore stickers and carried signs that said, "You got bailed out, we got sold out."

Larry Spivack, regional director for American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31, said the peaceful action will add to Chicago's rich history in the labor movement, which includes the deadly 1886 Haymarket affair, when Chicago laborers and anarchists gathering in a square on the city's West Side drew national attention when an unidentified person threw a bomb at police.

"The history of workers is built on issues like this here today," Spivack said.

Police spokeswoman Laura Kubiak said authorities were aware of the situation and officers were patrolling the area.

Workers were angered when company officials didn't show up for a meeting Friday arranged by U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a Chicago Democrat, Fried said. Union officials said another meeting with the company is scheduled for Monday afternoon.

"We're going to stay here until we win justice," said Blanca Funes, 55, of Chicago, after occupying the building for several hours.

Speaking in Spanish, Funes said she fears losing her home without the wages she feels she's owed. A 13-year employee of Republic, she estimated her family can make do for three months without her paycheck.

Most of the factory's workers are Hispanic.

06 December 2008

[Chicago] Laid Off Workers Occupy Factory

re-posted from the socialistworker.org

Lee Sustar reports from Chicago on an occupation by workers who want what's theirs from management and the Bank of America.

WORKERS OCCUPYING the Republic Windows & Doors factory slated for closure are vowing to remain in the Chicago plant until they win the $1.5 million in severance and vacation pay owed them by management.

In a tactic rarely used in the U.S. since the labor struggles of the 1930s, the workers, members of United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) Local 1110, refused to leave the plant on December 5, its last scheduled day of operation.

"We decided to do it because this is money that belongs to us," said Maria Roman, who's worked at the plant for eight years. "These are our rights."

Word of the occupation spread quickly both among labor and immigrant rights activists--the overwhelming majority of the workers are Latinos. Seven local TV news stations showed up to do interviews and live reports, and a steady stream of activists arrived to bring donations of food and money and to plan solidarity actions.

Management claims that it can't continue operations because its main creditor, Bank of America (BoA), refuses to make any more loans to the company. After workers picketed BoA headquarters December 3, bank officials agreed to sit down with Republic management and UE to discuss the matter at a December 5 meeting arranged by U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill), said UE organizer Leah Fried.

BoA had said that it couldn't discuss the matter with the union directly without written approval from Republic's management. But Republic representatives failed to show up at the meeting, and plant managers prepared to close the doors for good--violating the federal WARN Act that requires 60 days notice of a plant closure.

The workers decided this couldn't go unchallenged. "The company and Bank of America are throwing the ball to one another, and we're in the middle," said Vicente Rangel, a shop steward and former vice president of Local 1110.

Many workers had suspected the company was planning to go out of business--and perhaps restart operations elsewhere. Several said managers had removed both production and office equipment in recent days.

Furthermore, while inventory records indicated there were plenty of parts in the plant, workers on the production line found shortages. And the order books, while certainly down from the peak years of the housing boom, didn't square with management's claims of a total collapse. "Where did all those windows go?" one worker asked.

Workers were especially outraged that Bank of America, which recently received a bailout in taxpayer money, won't provide credit to Republic. "They get $25 billion from the government, and won't loan a few million to this company so workers can keep their jobs?" said Ricardo Caceres, who has worked at the plant for six years.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

THE MEMBERS of Local 1110 have a history of struggle. In 2004, they decertified the Central States Joint Board--a union notorious for corruption and sweetheart contracts with management--and brought in UE, a far more democratic organization.

In May of this year, Local 1110 mobilized for a contract by organizing a "practice" picket, and 70 workers used their lunch break to confront the boss with a petition listing their demands. The workers were able to turn back company's effort to win major concessions and won solid pay increases.Now, management is trying to get revenge by pocketing money that belongs to the workers.

UE officials and workers acknowledge that it will be difficult to stop the plant from closing. But they're determined to get the money owed to them--and they believe that by fighting, they can set an example for other workers facing layoffs and plant closures as the recession deepens.

Negotiations are set for Monday, December 8. Whatever happens, however, the workers have already sent a message to employers that if they violate workers rights and the law, they can expect a fight.

"This is a message to the workers of America," said Vicente Rangel, the shop steward. "If we stand together, we will prevail until justice is done, and we get what we're due."


WHAT YOU CAN DO

If you live in the Chicago area, come to a rally on Saturday, December 6, at 12 Noon at Republic Windows, 1333 N. Hickory in Chicago, on Goose Island. If negotiations with Bank of America fail to resolve the issue, there will be a picket of BoA's Chicago headquarters at 231 S. LaSalle on Tuesday, December 9 at 12 noon.

Members of Local 1110 need your support. Make checks payable to the UE Local 1110 Solidarity Fund, and mail to: 37 S. Ashland, Chicago, IL 60607. Messages of support can be sent to leahfried@gmail.com. For more information, call UE at 312-829-8300.

At the Jobs with Justice Web site, you can send a message of protest to Bank of America.