01 February 2010

[Somalia] Somali 'Pirates' want to send loot confiscated from rich countries to Haiti

re-posted from IllVox.org

Somali ‘Pirates’ want to send loot confiscated from rich countries to Haiti

Agencia Matriz del Sur

Via Aporrea.org (translated)
http://aporrea.org/internacionales/n149313.html

January 21, 2010 – Spokesmen for the so-called “Somali pirates” have expressed
willingness to transfer part of their loot captured from transnational boats
and send it to Haiti.

Leaders of these groups have declared they have links in various places around
the world to help them ensure the delivery of aid without being detected by
the armed forces of enemy governments.

The “pirates” typically redistribute a significant portion of their profits
among relatives and the local population. In their operations, the “pirates”
urge transnational corporations that own the cargo confiscated to pay back in
cash as banks can not operate in Somalia.

”The humanitarian aid to Haiti can not be controlled by the United States and
European countries; they have no moral authority to do so. They are the ones
pirating mankind for many years,” said the Somali spokesman.

Somalia, located at the eastern end of the Somalia Penisula adjacent to the
Gulf of Aden to the North and with the Indian ocean to the east, is located in
a very important position in the communication routes between Asia, Africa and
Europe and the Pacific.

24 January 2010

[Italy] Homefulness

re-posted from Save Feral Human Habitat

Off the Streets and Onto the Farm, 01/22/10
By Chris Johnson, Victoria Independent Media Collective

A dream is taking shape on the Saanich Peninsula. Inspired by the work of the San Patrignano Farm in Italy, Richard LeBlanc and a team of dedicated volunteers are converting a piece of farmland in Central Saanich into a therapeutic community that will become a refuge for people experiencing homelessness.

LeBlanc and the Creating Homefulness Society took possession of the198 acre property in June of 2009. Woodwynn Farm, which has recently been used for mostly for hay crops, was developed by the Woodward family, formers owners of a department store chain.

Woodwynn Farms has already faced it’s share of challenges even before taking possession of the farm. When LeBlanc and supporters set about to purchase the property, some of the nearby residents formed the Farmlands Trust, and with support of the Land Conservancy, set out to buy the farm to keep the homeless people out.

Central Saanich council has also put up it’s share of obstacles to the idea, refusing to allow any of the homeless people to actually live on the farm.

LeBlanc and everyone else involved with Woodwynn are optimistic however. They’ve already seen changes with some of the people who have come to visit and pitch in on the farm, and are committed to convincing the community of the great benefits this project can provide.

Below is a selection of media articles to help you learn more about the project.

Also visit the Woodwynn Farms website at www.creatinghomefulness.org

——————–

Woodwynn Shows the Way, Times Colonist – March 20, 2009 (scroll down on that page)

Advocates for the homeless raise funds to purchase Woodwynn Farm in Central Saanich – Times Colonist, March 19, 2009

Woodwynn Farm sold for homeless solution, Peninsula News – March 18, 2009

Homeless Farm Plan Sparks $6 Million Race, Times Colonist – May 22, 2008

Native Band Sues Crown Over Title to Woodwynn Farm, Times Colonist – September 20, 2008

Woodwynn Neighbours Close to Raising Down Payment, Times Colonist – September 17, 2008

Central Saanich Nixes Proposal for Homeless Working on Farm, Times Colonist, February 12, 2008

New Role Sought for Famed Farm, Times Colonist, January 13, 2008


[Germany] Bans Monsanto GMO Corn

Been a long time... And this news is a pretty old now. I'm catching up on old emails. But still good news. --ianna.

re-posted from Action Spark

Germany Bans Monsanto GMO Corn, posted by Kyra, 04/14/09

Germany just recently joined a number of other European countries who have banned Monsanto GMO (Genetically Modified) corn from being grown in the country.

Monsanto corn has until now been the only GMO crop grown somewhat widely in Europe, the EU having been wary of GMO crops overall since their introduction to the global food market. This is definitely a win for the the movement against spreading GMO crops.

GMO’s are problematic for many reasons. First off, many people have psychological barriers to the idea of eating a tomato with genes from an elephant. There’s just something a bit strange about the idea. For some people this is a religious matter based on humans meddling with God’s work. However there are also major health concerns regarding GMO’s, and huge political battles being waged over the way companies handle and patent them. It is the case that we do not know how GMO crops will affect the environments they are introduced to on any kind of long term basis, nor how fiddling with our foods genetic makeup could affect the health of humans consuming it. While hybrid species are often capable of growing back into natural or heritage varieties, it is unlikely that GMO plants be able to rid themselves of genes not related in anyway to their species. Is there any research suggesting that GMO plants could be reintroduced into the environment and returned to their original strain over time?

The main argument against GMO’s is that there isnt enough conclusive evidence to show they are not harmful. It is also the case that many companies have taken advantage of genetic modification to patent and charge exorbitant prices for different disease resistant strains of GMO crops, such as Monsanto’s corn. It is possible for these companies to sue farmers living next door to GMO crop sowing neighbours if some of the seed blows over into their field and takes root.

Companies also often make these seeds so that they cannot reproduce on their own.Thus farmers are obliged to buy and rebuy seeds each year, making more money for the companies, but strangling the workers of the agricultural sector across the globe.

To read a brief BBC article on the recent banning of Monsanto corn, go here.



15 January 2010

CA court says no tasering for fun/convenience

Appeals Court Ruling Curbs Use of Tasers

LOS ANGELES, Dec. 30 (UPI) -- A ruling that a California police officer can be held liable for Taser-related injuries will force reviews on stun gun use, a police conduct expert said.

Experts said the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling, if it stands, would set precedent for when police could use Tasers and force departments in California, and possibly nationwide, to revise policies governing Taser use, the Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.

Michael Gennaco, a police conduct expert who has reviewed stun gun use for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, said Monday's ruling bars officers from using Tasers in a variety of situations, limiting their use to instances when a person poses an obvious danger.

"This decision talks about the need for an immediate threat," Gennaco told the Times. "Some departments allow Tasers in cases of passive resistance, such as protesters who won't move (which) is out the door now with this decision."

The three-judge panel's unanimous ruling arose from a 2005 encounter between a former Coronado, Calif., police officer who stopped a man for not wearing a seat belt while driving. The man sustained injuries and lost several teeth when he struck the ground after being Tasered by the police officer.

The appellate court did not rule on whether the police officer acted appropriately, but cleared the way for a civil case against the officer and the city of Coronado in a lower court, the Times said.

In their decision, the judges established legally binding standards about where Tasers fit in the types of force available to police officers and spelled out guidelines for their use.

12 December 2009

Columbia U Loses the Land!

NY court blocks Columbia University expansion
12.03.09

By Joan Gralla

[suggested by Caroline]

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York state court ruled on Thursday that the state cannot seize land Columbia University wants for a $6.3 billion expansion of its campus in northern Manhattan.

The Appellate Division rebuked the Ivy League university for partly creating the blight in West Harlem that was then used to justify the state's use of the power of eminent domain to wrest 17 acres, located in one of New York City's poorest neighborhoods, from the property owners.

A copy of the decision by the mid-level appeals court was posted by The New York Times on its website.

The decision contrasts with a ruling by the state's highest court last month that found the state could take land for the $4 billion Atlantic Yards development project in Brooklyn.

"The time has come to categorically reject eminent domain takings solely based on underutilization," the court said. The doctrine of "underutilization" would wrongly subject all properties to "the ultimate commercial development" even if that clashed with a neighborhood's character, it said.

A university spokeswoman was not available to comment.

The appeals court said the state failed to show that Columbia's expansion had a public purpose, a requirement that must be met to seize land. Eminent domain in the past has been used to make room for projects including hospitals and turnpikes.

"Empire State Development Corporation's determination that the project has a public use, benefit or purpose is wholly unsupported by the record and precedent," said the court.

"The blight designation in the instant case is mere sophistry."

From 2002 to 2006, Columbia bought and gained control of most of the land it needed to expand, and forced out at least half of the tenants, the court said.

Columbia failed to fix water leaks in these properties, "even when minor and economically rational repairs could arrest deterioration," the court wrote.

Further, the court said: "Columbia left building code violations open, let tenants use premises in violation of local codes and ordinances by parking cars on sidewalks and obstructing fire exits, and maintaining garbage and debris in certain buildings over a period of years."

The court faulted several blight studies, saying of one: "Even a cursory examination of the study reveals the idiocy of considering things like unpainted block walls or loose awning supports as evidence of a blighted neighborhood." Similar conditions could be found throughout the city, it said.

[re-edited by Forbes]


09 November 2009

BS Charges Dropped Against G-20 Twitter Activists

"Twitter" charges dropped; secret affidavit to be made public Nov. 23rd

"You can beat the rap, but not the ride."
- Miami cop discussing preemptive FTAA arrests in 2003

Not surprisingly, the charges against Elliot Madison and Michael Wallschlager have been droppedAllegheny County District Attorney's office. Generally, individuals employed by law enforcement agencies tend to pad the charges of the people they arrest with offenses of a much more serious nature, as a means of accumulating the "arrest points" to raise their efficiency rating, a key factor in career advancement, as well as an effort to get the unfortunate soul who has been arrested to plead guilty to lesser charges.

The arrests and detentions that precede the mass protests which are organized as a response to a gathering of the elites, such as a trade summit, like the recent G-20 in Pittsburgh, or a political convention, usually have no merit according to the laws of the US, but are a deliberate effort to remove select individuals or groups from the field, for the duration of the demonstrations. The strategy behind these kinds of detentions seems to have evolved in the past decade or so. What was once a fishing expedition to ascribe sinister purposes to common household items, such as the raids on the warehouse used to construct puppets before the 2000 Republican National Convention in Philadelphia, had morphed into the provocation and entrapment of the 2008 RNC. A reflection of the increasing militarization of US law enforcement, the preemptive raids against the temporary logistical infrastructure used to resist the G-20 in Pittsburgh seemed to adhere to orthodox military doctrine.

Since Pittsburgh SWAT was nearly disbanded for incompetence, it may be a hard sell to characterize whoever was in charge of "security" (does anyone know?) as some kind of brilliant tactician, especially after their choice to launch their indiscriminate gas and LRAD/megaphone attack from the bottom of a hill, a position that has traditionally spelled defeat. The attacks on mobile kitchens, community farms, independent media, and communications betray a mindset that views any opposition to the status quo as a bona fide insurgency. Aside from the thrill of playing "operator," (to use their unfortunate appropriation of military jargon) with none of the risks associated with attacking armed, fortified positions, why else would dozens of cops armed with automatic weapons launch paramilitary raids on pacifists, widely known to be unarmed, if not to disrupt "supply lines" and "enemy communication?"

Whether these products of the centralized, top-down command structure and culture of bureaucratic agencies, armed or otherwise, simply lack the ability to understand the decentralized and horizontal nature of anarchist organizing, or they and their hand puppets in the media choose to designate certain individuals as "leaders," for their own purposes, namely more compelling storytelling. This also reflects an adherence, as well as an appeal to a basic component of the right-wing worldview, one that has long been taught in schools and forms the basis of most conspiracy theories, namely that the individual is the primary agent of historical change. 'Founding fathers' and '9/11 truth' both spring forth from the same part of the imagination that occasionally gives rise to visions of 'anarchist leaders.' A comment on the website of the NY Daily News, who were the first mainstream media outlet to report on the raid of their home is typical of this kind of "George Soros pays protesters" mindset:

The pimply faced teens can be manipulated by these jerks! Asyou can see, the scumbags are safely in the motel and running the show! They are not out fromt with the idealists who are not old enough or wise enough to realize that they are being manipulated by these despots who want to control them! If your cause is so important to you, why the masks? If you think the government has spyware to look thru the clearisil you are mistaken! Perhaps if your parents were made to pay for your fun, you wouldn't be so destructive! Why do your ilk smash the property of hard working people? Your dogma says that "the man " is bad, The only ones I see are detrimental(read bad) is you! Scumbags!

The residents of Tortuga House can use whatever help you can spare. Although like most recent examples of efforts to transmute dissent into "terrorism," it is likely another attempt for the FBI to justify its budget, and therefore its existence, there is a federal investigation pending, which based on the vague warrant and items seized during the 16 hour raid, it is likely another fishing expedition. There is also the matter of the grand jury and the sealed affidavit:

At a hearing today, instead of oral arguments regarding a defense motion to unseal the secret 18-page affidavit authorizing the arrests of Elliott Madison and Michael Wallschlager at a motel just outside of Pittsburgh, the prosecution immediately moved to withdraw all charges against the two before the defense had a chance to argue its case. Although clear from the beginning that these charges were absurd based on the State’s very own laws, our housemates were incarcerated for 36 hours, had their van towed and belongings confiscated, and one house member was given $30,000 in straight bail.

The District Attorney and his spokesperson were at pains to explain why the State would drop all charges against these dangerous twitterists and of course, refused to admit that these charges were unconstitutional and a heavy-handed attempt to scare anarchists and others from protesting in ways unsanctioned by the government. Instead, the prosecution says they decided that pursuing the charges “would be unwise” after consulting other law enforcement agencies and because of other pending investigations. The secret affidavit authorizing the arrests in Pennsylvania is set to become public on Nov. 23rd. We imagine the Pennsylvania State Police will seek an extension to keep this document sealed—perhaps in order to hide the flimsiness of their secret evidence? However, no matter the reason, we will fight to unseal this document and we will not let the State hide behind sealed evidence, obscure innuendo, and other traditional tactics used by secret police.

15 October 2009

[NYC] More Glamdalizing: Queers bash back against NYPD

suggestion by Elliott, re-posted from Bash Back News

New York Queers Bash Back Against NYPD

Listen up bitches!

The 77th Precinct is fucked up, and here’s why:

-officers of the 77th are responsible for consistent harassment of transpeople, sex workers and queers

-the assault of two lesbians outside of the Ife Lounge on May 16th

-like all police officers, they colonize poor neighborhoods and threaten the safety of everyone

We act in solidarity with Duanna Johnson, the patrons of Fort Worth’s Rainbow Lounge, Ariel Attack, Bash Back! Lansing, New Jersey 4 and countless other fabulous queers and trannies bound by the prison-industrial complex—with no safe words. We want not just accountability for these specific cops but the complete abolition of police and prisons.

In a fabulous act of resistance and exterior design, we have beautified the squad and personal cars of the 77th Precinct with a simple, yet classy, application of spray paint, stencils and glitter everywhere. (We’re still queefing glitter.) Fine images of cops on fire and such fierce phrases like: “This is what happens to transphobic cops,” “A change I can believe in” and “A very simple solution…” are proudly displayed on the windows and doors of New York’s Finest.

Just as a reminder to them and all of us: these pigs are vulnerable, and they’re only as powerful as we let them be. They can and will be challenged and held accountable.

That’s some real shit.
Yours queerly,

Farosha Shakure

Press Secretary of Homoexplosion, Aries, and licensed switch blade carrier.

Homoexplosion is a radical queer/trans group of fly fatherfuckers. We advocate people fucking in the street and burning shit—especially cops.